Supportive Counsel You Can Rely On

Pensacola Equitable Distribution Attorneys

The term Equitable Distribution is used in almost every divorce case in the state of Florida. Pensacola divorce courts use this term when referencing the division of assets and liabilities obtained during the marriage. The term generally refers a fair distribution of the assets and liabilities between the parties. However, in some cases this does not mean an actual even split between the parties.

Though the equitable distribution of assets and debts may sound like straightforward process for the parties, it is often one of the most litigated issues in a divorce case.

For instance, our Pensacola divorce attorneys are often faced with the following topics:

  • Adverse parties’ secret assets or funds
  • Dissolved assets or values of assets
  • Opposing counsel intentionally under-valuing assets
  • Opposing counsel intentionally over-valuing assets
  • Co-mingling of nonmarital assets or funds

What are some common examples of marital property under Florida’s equitable distribution statute?

Some common examples of marital property include:

  • Assets and debts acquired by the spouses during the marriage
  • Enhancement of the value of a non-marital asset during the marriage due to the joint efforts of the parties
  • Joint bank accounts
  • Retirement benefits earned during the marriage
  • Gifts made during the marriage from one spouse to another

What process does the Pensacola family aw judge use to carry out equitable distribution?

The Pensacola judge typically first determines whether the property of the parties should be classified as marital or nonmarital property. Your Pensacola attorney will work closely with you to determine how each piece of property was acquired and under what circumstances. Then they will methodically develop a plan for presenting the best arguments for the judge on your behalf.

Once the judge has determined the appropriate classification of the property, he or she will then consider if any of the nonmarital property was commingled during the marriage with marital property. This is significant to the court because if nonmarital property was comingled with marital property, it is highly likely that the court would then classify the nonmarital property as marital because the comingling makes it seem as though the nonmarital property was intended to become marital at the time of comingling.

Once the judge has had an opportunity to hear the facts of the case, he or she will make the appropriate determinations and award the marital or nonmarital property to the appropriate party under the law.

Common examples of non-marital property being reclassified as marital property are:

  • One party brings a home into the marriage and places the other party on the title to the home
  • The party placed nonmarital funds into a joint bank account
  • A spouse takes marital funds and places them into an account that has only contained nonmarital funds in it prior to that

Our Pensacola divorce attorneys will be able to aid you in determining the probable determination of your assets and debts. If you have questions regarding the equitable distribution of your assets, call our Pensacola office today at (800) 822-5170.

What factors does a Florida court look at when determining how to equitably distribute property and debts in a Florida divorce case?

Florida’s equitable distribution statute provides a list of factors the court must consider when distributing property and debts in a divorce case.

The factors that the Pensacola family law judge must consider when determining the outcome of your case are:

  • The contribution to the marriage by each spouse, including contributions to the care and education of the children and services as homemaker
  • The economic circumstances of the parties
  • The duration of the marriage
  • Any interruption of personal careers or educational opportunities of either party
  • The contribution of one spouse to the personal career or educational opportunity of the other spouse
  • The desirability of retaining any asset, including an interest in a business, corporation, or professional practice, intact and free from any claim or interference by the other party
  • The contribution of each spouse to the acquisition, enhancement, and production of income or the improvement of, or the incurring of liabilities to, both the marital assets and the nonmarital assets of the parties
  • The desirability of retaining the marital home as a residence for any dependent child of the marriage, or any other party under the following conditions: when it would be equitable to do so, if it is in the best interest of the child or that party, and if it is financially feasible for the parties to maintain the residence until the child is emancipated or until exclusive possession is otherwise terminated by a court of competent jurisdiction. In making this determination, the court shall first determine if it would be in the best interest of the dependent child to remain in the marital home and, if not, whether other equities would be served by giving any other party exclusive use and possession of the marital home
  • The intentional dissipation, waste, depletion, or destruction of marital assets after the filing of the petition or within 2 years prior to the filing of the petition
  • Any other factors necessary to do equity and justice between the parties

Our Pensacola divorce attorneys are experienced litigators who have practiced throughout the Florida Panhandle. We have developed proven practices that will achieve your litigation goals. We are no strangers to working with experts in other professions to further your equitable distribution objective.

Let our Pensacola attorneys put their proven methods to work for you during this crucial time. Call our divorce attorneys today and schedule your consultation.

What Our Clients Say

  • “Gerard is a brilliant attorney and he's the one you want on your side! ”

    Rusty Shepard, Criminal Defense Attorney

  • “The clients I refer to Mr. Virga are always satisfied with and complimentary of his services.”

    Joseph Turner, Criminal Defense Attorney

  • “It was a blessing for me to have Gerard on my side during the divorce!”

    Visi, A Divorce Client

  • “Mr. Virga not only accepted me as a client, but he took my case to heart.”

    A Litigation Client

  • “Gerard is smarter than 95% of people I know, including lawyers. ”

    Adam Ellis, Litigation Lawyer

  • “Mr. Virga treated me with professionalism and fought my case well!”

    A Divorce Client

  • Best of Bay 2016
  • The National Advocates
  • Super Lawyers Rising Star
  • The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers
  • Avvo Rating 10.0 Superb
  • The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Lawyers
  • 10 Best by American Institute of Family Law Attorneys | 2016