Orlando Equitable Distribution Attorneys

In many cases our Orlando equitable distribution attorneys are faced with the following issues:

• Hidden assets or funds
• Dissipated assets or values of assets
• Opposing counsel intentionally under-valuing assets that client wishes to be awarded
• Opposing counsel intentionally over-valuing assets that you are seeking to be awarded by the court
• Co-mingling of non-marital assets or funds

Some common examples of marital property include:

• Assets and debts acquired the spouses during the marriage
• Enhancement of the value of a non-marital asset during the marriage due to the efforts of the other spouse
• Joint bank accounts
• Retirement benefits earned during the marriage
• A gift during the marriage from one spouse to another, and a joint bank account

Some common examples of non-marital property being reclassified as marital property are:

• One party brings a home into the marriage and places the other party on the title to the home
• The party placed non-marital funds into a joint bank account
• A spouse takes marital funds and places them into an account that has only contained non-marital funds in it prior to that

The factors that a family law judge must consider are:

• The contribution to the marriage by each spouse, including contributions to the care and education of the children and services as homemaker
• The economic circumstances of the parties
• The duration of the marriage
• Any interruption of personal careers or educational opportunities of either party
• The contribution of one spouse to the personal career or educational opportunity of the other spouse
• The desirability of retaining any asset, including an interest in a business, corporation, or professional practice, intact and free from any claim or interference by the other party
• The contribution of each spouse to the acquisition, enhancement, and production of income or the improvement of, or the incurring of liabilities to, both the marital assets and the non-marital assets of the parties
• The desirability of retaining the marital home as a residence for any dependent child of the marriage, or any other party, when it would be equitable to do so, it is in the best interest of the child or that party, and it is financially feasible for the parties to maintain the residence until the child is emancipated or until exclusive possession is otherwise terminated by a court of competent jurisdiction. In making this determination, the court shall first determine if it would be in the best interest of the dependent child to remain in the marital home; and, if not, whether other equities would be served by giving any other party exclusive use and possession of the marital home
• The intentional dissipation, waste, depletion, or destruction of marital assets after the filing of the petition or within 2 years prior to the filing of the petition
• Any other factors necessary to do equity and justice between the parties